Monaghan is sexy but has to carry a lot of the narrative Bernsen is merely a face Miller has a small turn but generally everyone is in the shadown of Kilmer, Downey and Black. The support cast are good but not as strong. They both work really well together and their chemistry produces a real energy.
Kilmer is equally as good albeit in a smaller role he is smart, tough and yet able to work well with his genre-busting character. In the rest of the film he is just as strong and is really fun. His narration is very natural and convincing and he really brings out the humour in his lines. Of course it wouldn't have worked without a cast that "got" what he was doing and fortunately his casting director got him two great leads. As director he has injected a lot of style into the film and is well supported by really cool opening credits, some wicked black humour and a strong soundtrack. What was pretty surprising was how well it all worked together. Black does well with this though and his dialogue is full of great one-liners (as I expected) but also a lot of knowing references to the genre and the clichés that he helped create (which I didn't expect). This is never done to the detriment of the narrative although some people may be disappointed that it takes precedence over traditional action (which it is quite light on). To some viewers I'm sure that it will be a bit too knowing but for me it was tremendously self-effacing fun. However what really makes the film work is the post-ironic and fun delivery throughout. Sure it is full of holes at points and lacks some logic in the way it jumps around but it flows really well. The plot is a real strength as it updates the potboilers of the 1940's with a complex string of "unrelated" murders that build together to a relatively satisfying conclusion. But with so many bodies all at once, are the cases as separate as they first appear? Having spent a bit of time in the wilderness since his glory days, Shane Black returned to the screens properly as writer and director with an effective film that works surprisingly well in the genre he dominates while also poking fun at it. She turns to Harry for help who, in a fit of puppy love, tells her he is a private detective. Coincidentally Harry's childhood sweetheart (Harmony) has her younger sister turn up in LA before committing suicide. They leave the body and go their separate ways, but the body then turns up in Harry's bathroom and Perry realises that it is a setup. When Harry joins Perry on a stake-out to learn the job they wind up balls-deep in mystery when they recover a dead body from the trunk of a dumped car. This also involves parties, at one of which he meets "Gay" Perry, a PI who acts as an adviser on such movies.
I) Trends II) The Making of The Group III) Reviews, 1965-1967 IV) Careers V) The Movie Past.Having stumbled into a casting session, petty thief Harry Lockhart has found himself flown to LA to try out for the lead in a major film. The book is divided into five sections, titled: The book is now out-of-print in the United States, but is still published in the United Kingdom by the independent publishing company Marion Boyars Publishers. This appeal is what attracts us, and ultimately what makes us despair when we begin to understand how seldom movies are more than this." The title itself is a reference to the character of James Bond, who was often referred to as Mr Kiss Kiss, Bang Bang in international markets the original theme song for the 1965 Bond film Thunderball was to have had this title. In her note on the title which begins the book, Kael asserts that these words are "perhaps the briefest statement imaginable of the basic appeal of movies. The book also features a smaller collection of synopses (as opposed to full-length reviews) of little-known movies, some of which are also printed in Kael's 5001 Nights at the Movies. This is erroneously considered to be the reason why she was fired from her short-lived position as their film critic. It features her review of The Sound of Music, which she notoriously dubbed "The Sound of Money," sparking outrage from loyal readers of McCall's. Kiss Kiss Bang Bang (1968) is Pauline Kael's second collection of reviews from 1965 through 1968, compiled from numerous magazines including The Atlantic, Holiday, The New Yorker, Life, Mademoiselle, The New Republic, McCall's, and Vogue.
0 kommentar(er)
